According to OKG Research analysis, Tether's net profit in 2024 reached $13 billion, of which only 54% came from US bond interest, and nearly $5 billion came from unrealized floating profits of BTC and gold. BTC holdings exceeded 100000, demonstrating a high volatility return structure. Circle disclosed in its IPO prospectus that its revenue for 2024 will reach $1.676 billion, with 95% -99% coming from interest income and service income accounting for only 0.9%. Tether tends to adopt an "offshore hedge fund" model, while Circle steadily promotes compliant listing, more like a "digital currency fund" deeply anchored in the interest rate cycle. The profit structure differentiation between the two stablecoins is becoming increasingly apparent.

According to the popularity ranking, EOS's popularity and attention remain the same as yesterday, ranking first. The popularity ranking is as follows: ① EOS （$0.7919，-2.64%） ② ACT （$0.05306，-24.28%） ③ ETH （$1817.89，-3.25%） ④ MASK （$1.22，-12.86%） ⑤ SOL （$118.28，-6.06%） The buying power of EOS's main funds is average, with a net inflow of $21.08 million in 24 hours and a transaction volume of $213.9 million in 24 hours, of which the net inflow of the main funds is $5.4367 million.

PayPal expanded its crypto offerings to include Solana and Chainlink within the United States and associated territories.Previously, SOL and LINK were only accessible on the payment processor through a MoonPay partnership.

On April 3rd, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale deposited its final 624.4 ETH ($1.14 million) into Kraken after a three-year hiatus. 8 years ago, the whale spent $25000 to obtain 3271 ETH from Kraken and The DAO, earning a profit of $4.24 million.

BlockBeats news, on April 3rd, First Digital released an official statement on social media: "Justin Sun's allegations against FDT at today's media conference are unfounded. We firmly deny any claims that FDT is involved in coordinating plans or misappropriating funds. We want to emphasize that these allegations are completely unfounded and the facts are completely wrong. FDT only acts as an intermediary and executes transactions according to the instructions of Techeryx and its authorized representatives. FDT does not have, nor is it obligated to independently evaluate or recommend Techeryx's investment. We have never moved or invested funds without explicit written instructions from Techeryx or its authorized representatives. All reserve assets were deployed strictly in accordance with the written instructions provided by Techeryx and its authorized representatives at that time. We have a record of all written instructions as evidence. Regarding Techeryx's request to redeem funds, ARIA has expressed its anti money laundering (AML) and KYC concerns regarding the acquisition transaction between TrueCoin and Techeryx, as well as the identity of the ultimate beneficial owner of Techeryx. As of today, Techteryx has refused to provide the information requested by ARIA. We reiterate that FDT remains fully solvent, with each FDUSD fully supported by cash and cash equivalents in a 1:1 ratio. The exact ISIN numbers of all reserve assets that support FDUSD are clearly listed in our certification report and can be publicly verified. We are processing redemption requests as usual. We are seeking legal advice and FDT will take legal action to protect its rights and reputation