BitGo 宣布与SOL Strategies 合作，扩展 Solana 机构质押服务

2025-05-05 02:03

PANews5月5日消息，数字资产托管与质押服务提供商BitGo近日宣布，已选择SOL Strategies,Inc.作为其Solana（SOL）验证器合作伙伴。此次合作旨在强化面向机构投资者的Solana质押服务。通过该合作，客户可以利用BitGo的安全托管基础设施，同时通过SOLStrategies运营的高性能、高收益且获得ISO-27001认证的Solana验证器进行SOL质押。 (PANews)

24시간 플래시

오늘 2025-05-05

06:17

Vitalik: The quality of the underlying proof system in L2 networks is equally important and should gradually enter the second stage as it develops

Odaily Planet Daily News: In response to the naming tag BattleTested proposed by community member Daniel Wang for Stage 2 of the L2 network, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik posted on the X platform, saying, "This is a good reminder that Stage 2 is not the only factor affecting security, and the quality of the underlying proof system is equally important. This is a simplified mathematical model that shows when to enter Stage 2: Each member of the Security Council has a 10% chance of independent 'breaking'; We consider activity failure (refusal of signature or key access) and security failure (signing the wrong thing or key being hacked) as equally likely; Goal: Minimize the likelihood of protocol collapse under the above assumptions. *Stage 0 Security Council is 4/7, Stage 1 is 6/8; Please note that these assumptions are very incomplete. In fact, members of the Security Council have a "common pattern failure": they may collude, or all be coerced or hacked in the same way, and so on. This makes both Stage 0 and Stage 1 less secure than shown in the model, so entering Stage 2 earlier than implied by the model is the best choice. In addition, please note that by turning the proof system itself into a multi signature of multiple independent systems, the probability of the proof system crashing can be greatly reduced (which is what I advocated in my previous proposal). I suspect that all second phase deployments in previous years will be like this. Considering these factors, this is a chart. The X-axis represents the probability of system failure. The Y-axis represents the probability of protocol collapse. As the quality of the proof system improves, the optimal stage shifts from stage 0 to stage 1, and then from stage 1 to stage 2. Using the quality proof system of Stage 0 for Stage 2 is the worst. In short, @ l2beat should ideally demonstrate proof of system auditing and maturity metrics (preferably proof of system implementation rather than the entire summary so that we can reuse it) as well as stages

06:09