Hyperliquid stated on the X platform that the community has played a crucial role in the development of the ecosystem, and its feedback has also been highly valued. Recently, there have been some misunderstandings regarding validators. Hereby clarify: ① All validators are qualified based on their performance on the testing network and cannot obtain seats through purchase; The relevant false statements belittle the efforts of validators who invest time and energy in understanding the system; With the maturity of blockchain, the set of validators will gradually expand As previously announced, a Foundation Entrustment Program will be launched to support high performing validators and further decentralize the network Anyone can run an API server that points to any node; The example client code sends requests to a specific API server, but this is not a basic requirement of the network Yes, it is unacceptable for users to attempt to create a black market for the testing network HYPE; This has been repeatedly stated; We will continue to work hard to improve the entry process of the testing network Yes, the node code is currently closed source; Open source is very important, and projects will be open sourced once they enter a stable state of development; The development speed of Hyperliquid is several orders of magnitude faster than most projects, and its scope is also several orders of magnitude larger than most projects; The code will be open sourced in a secure manner Yes, currently there is only one binary file. Even for very mature networks like Solana, the vast majority of validators run a single client. Earlier today, a user wrote a letter to the Hyperliquid Core team pointing out multiple management issues.