The most dangerous script for tomorrow is if Powell's statement leans hawkish while one of the Mag 7 companies' guidance is not strong enough. If both narratives weaken simultaneously, the market will look worse than if any single issue arises.
Written by: Xu Chao
Source: Wall Street Journal
April 29 will be the busiest trading day of the year.
Three major events are crammed into the same day: at 10 AM local time, the Senate Banking Committee will vote on Powell's successor, Kevin Warsh; at 2 PM, the FOMC will issue its interest rate statement — this will be Powell's last as Federal Reserve Chair; after hours, Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon will release their quarterly earnings reports.
The market's expectation is crystal clear — CME FedWatch shows a near 100% probability of no rate change, the Nasdaq closed at an all-time high last week, and 82% of earnings reports this quarter have exceeded expectations. Three events, three optimistic expectations, queuing independently.
The problem is that these optimistic expectations share the same foundation: if the Federal Reserve can continue to "see through" the $108 oil price, the interest rate path remains unchanged, and the tech stocks' 25 times forward P/E can "sustain." Any hawkish signal from Powell or any crack in the Mag 7 earnings reports will trigger seismic market reactions.
Powell's Last Word
The core of Powell's historical evaluation comes down to one thing: maintaining the Federal Reserve's policy independence during the toughest years of inflation. If his final statement as he steps down seems like a compromise for the market or politics, the cost will be higher than any decision error.
Coincidentally, on the same day, the Senate is pushing forward his successor's nomination. Warsh, just finished with the congressional hearing, stated he would "maintain independence" and would not be Trump's "mouthpiece." Their positions will be read side by side on the same day. Powell has no space to appear soft.
This is the April meeting, without a new dot plot or updated economic forecasts. The only channels to release signals are the wording of the statement and responses during the press conference; every word carries more weight than usual. Brent crude at $108, the Fed's March statement already planted the "Middle East situation remains uncertain" — this is an interface reserved for a more hawkish wording, not a qualitative conclusion.
The most crucial focus at the press conference is not "whether to cut interest rates," but how he characterizes oil prices: if he says "temporary supply shock," the market will breathe a sigh of relief; if he says "inflationary risks continue to exist," the 2-year Treasury yield will provide an answer within five minutes.
The First Real Check for AI
In the past two years, the Mag 7 has collectively done one thing: spent astronomical sums building AI infrastructure, then convinced investors to wait with "the future will be vast."
This logic will begin to be tested tonight.
The combined AI capital expenditures of Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Amazon have already surpassed $300 billion. The market's assigned timeline has always been "wait for earnings reports, watch cloud revenues, observe monetization." Now the earnings reports are here — how much of the money spent has begun to turn into revenue?
Current figures exceeding expectations are almost already priced in. What truly moves stock prices are forward guidance and every statement regarding future spending and return timelines made during the conference call.
Which Company's Call is Most Dangerous
All four companies releasing earnings reports on the same day have uneven risk distribution.
Microsoft is the first company to be scrutinized tonight. Azure's growth consensus is about 38%; simply reaching this number isn't enough — the market really wants to see if Copilot's enterprise side has quantifiable revenue contributions; that will be proof of Microsoft's two-year AI narrative coming to fruition. If Q2 guidance falls below 36%, it’s a negative signal; exceeding 40% would be a true pleasant surprise.
Alphabet's situation is slightly more complex than Microsoft's.
Google Cloud is expected to grow by 49.6%, and the market has the highest growth expectations, but Gemini's commercialization has yet to provide clear financial figures. For the first time, Alphabet must address this issue with specific revenues, not product demonstrations. Cloud revenue may exceed expectations, but the monetization signal for Gemini remains vague — that response might be cooler than anticipated.
Amazon AWS had a growth rate of 24% last quarter, with AI services annual revenue exceeding $15 billion; this line must be maintained tonight. A growth rate falling below 20% would be one of the significant turning points for the sentiment of the entire earnings season.
Meta is the most dangerous call of the night.
The flexibility for revenue and EPS is not very large; the real suspense lies in the $135 billion annual capital expenditure plan. This figure requires Zuckerberg to explain afresh every quarter: the money is necessary, the return path is clear, and the timeline is credible.
Any language suggesting "continually assessing based on market feedback" will be interpreted as a softening. In recent quarters, any hesitancy in capex statements has led to poor after-hours responses for Meta.
The simultaneous release of earnings reports from four companies presents another question: if one of them does not meet expectations, will the market's sentiment be hedged by the other three, or will that one company's crack be magnified into a broader issue within the entire AI narrative? This divergence scenario has not been fully priced in.
Optimistic Expectations Built on the Same Foundation
Tomorrow's information will land sequentially: at 2 PM, the statement will be released first, with the 2-year Treasury being the fastest thermometer, providing the market's first judgment within five minutes.
At 2:30 PM, Powell's press conference will begin, which is the highest information density window of the day; it will focus on whether the "inflationary risk" or "temporary supply shock" narrative prevails, as two qualitative assessments correspond to two entirely different interest rate path expectations.
After hours, Microsoft Azure Q2 guidance will be released first, with Meta's capex statement closing — that is the moment when the entire earnings season's information is most concentrated and the most prone to surprises.
With the VIX at 18, protection through options is extremely insufficient. If any negative triggers occur, the retraction speed will be significantly faster than usual.
The most dangerous script for tomorrow is if Powell's wording leans hawkish coupled with one of the Mag 7 companies' guidance not being strong enough. If both narratives weaken in the same direction, the day's market will look worse than if any single issue arises — because both issues are saying the same thing: the optimism in this market is built on a foundation that is narrowing.
Disclaimer: This article represents only the personal views of the author and does not represent the position and views of this platform. This article is for information sharing only and does not constitute any investment advice to anyone. Any disputes between users and authors are unrelated to this platform. If the articles or images on the webpage involve infringement, please provide relevant proof of rights and identity documents and send an email to support@aicoin.com. The relevant staff of this platform will conduct an investigation.