[Figma CEO: Bitcoin Has a Place on the Balance Sheet as Part of a Diversified Financial Strategy] According to BitcoinTreasuries.NET, Golden Finance reported that Dylan Field, CEO of the publicly listed company Figma, stated, 'Bitcoin has a place on the balance sheet as part of a diversified financial strategy.'

[Main Password: Coinbase perpetual contract leverage increased to 50 times, main trader trades $300 million betting in this direction] The main large order can be combined with the position difference indicator to judge the main force to open and close the position. Open PRO members can follow the main trading operations in time

Bitget TON/USDT's perpetual trading volume surged 19 times within 10 minutes, with a turnover of 6.86 million US dollars in the past 24 hours, a decrease of 2.90% A surge in trading volume generally indicates an increase in market trading activity or large-scale fund buying and selling operations, which may be caused by certain important market changes or news announcements. According to AiCoin data, the comprehensive ranking of Bitget contracts ranks fourth globally

The move keeps XRP locked in a 47-day consolidation under $3.00, with traders now eyeing the $2.77 support pivot and October’s SEC ETF decisions as the next catalysts.

[Wuxi Intermediate Court Discloses a Rejected 'Virtual Dollar' Case: An 80,000 Yuan Investment Can Only Be Redeemed for 0.1 Yuan] The official account of the Wuxi Intermediate People's Court disclosed a 'virtual dollar' case. The plaintiff entrusted another person to invest 84,350 yuan on a certain platform, converting it into 13,000 platform dollars. However, the platform suddenly collapsed, showing that the funds could only be redeemed for 0.1 yuan in RMB. Upon investigation, it was found that the plaintiff had entrusted another person to exchange the platform's virtual dollars, which was a decision made independently as part of their investment activity. Furthermore, the account and password for the platform were under the plaintiff's own control. In this case, the plaintiff did not complete the required registration procedures when investing on an overseas platform, and such investment activities are not protected under Chinese law. The corresponding investment risks must be borne by the plaintiff, and the court rejected the lawsuit.