Ethereum Coinbase premium gap drops to 10 month low

According to AiCoin monitoring, a large amount of funds flowed out of the US spot BTC ETF market yesterday, with a net outflow of up to $399 million. Among them, IBIT was the largest outflow, with a daily net outflow of $193 million; Next is FBTC, with a total of 121 million US dollars. According to the "Spot BTC ETF Tracking" real-time trading strategy developed by AiCoin, there is a significant positive correlation between the inflow of ETF funds and BTC prices. Subscription indicators can be used to automatically place orders based on the flow of funds in the program. Data for reference only

[South Korea to Launch Digital Asset Spot ETF] The South Korean Ministry of Finance announced it will launch a digital asset spot ETF.

[A whale deposits 8.09 million USDC into HyperLiquid to purchase nearly 60,000 SOL] On January 9, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale deposited 8.09 million USDC into HyperLiquid and purchased 59,458 SOL at a price range of $133.88 to $135, with a total value of approximately $8 million. In addition, the whale also holds 427,441 HYPE, valued at approximately $11.09 million.

[Whale Opens New HYPE Long Position, Total Unrealized Loss of $171,000] On January 9, according to Hyperinsight monitoring, the '30-time Long Trader Who Keeps Fighting Despite Losses' whale opened a new HYPE long position today with 5x leverage, totaling 63,381.45 HYPE (approximately $1.64 million) at an average entry price of $25.87. The position is currently in a slight unrealized profit state, while the total account unrealized loss stands at $171,000.

[SEI Chain Suffers $240,000 Flash Loan Attack Due to User Error Triggering Vulnerability] According to monitoring by BlockSec Phalcon, the attacker initiated a flash loan through the Synnax contract on the SEI chain, borrowing 1.96 million WSEI (approximately $240,000) without repayment. This attack was triggered by a user error three blocks prior, where address 0x9748…a714 mistakenly transferred funds into the contract, inadvertently providing financial support for the attack. The attack path involved transactions TX1 and TX2, highlighting that on-chain user errors can pose critical risk points in DeFi attacks.