Loading...
If your capital isn't huge this round and you're aiming for higher returns than BTC, I think allocating some leading altcoins is a good move, but the selection criteria must be stricter. Look for projects with real business operations, real revenue, and real token demand. Ideally, they should also have mechanisms like buybacks, token burns, or fee distribution, so the project's growth can genuinely translate into token value. Avoid pure governance tokens that lack value capture, as well as projects with significant future unlock pressures. For example, I’m optimistic about ONDO and SUI, but their ongoing large unlocks mean greater supply pressure and uncertainty. No matter how good a project is, you have to consider its token structure. I’m more focused on assets like HYPE, UNI, AAVE, and LINK: HYPE uses transaction fees to buy and burn HYPE; UNI has already started protocol fee buybacks and burns; AAVE continuously uses protocol revenue for buybacks; LINK has also begun converting enterprise and on-chain service revenue into LINK demand. When it comes to altcoins, you don’t necessarily need to chase the sexiest narratives. Instead, choose assets where the more profitable the project, the more the token benefits. These might not be the ones that pump the hardest, but in my view, they are the cream of the crop among leading altcoins. #Crypto #Altcoins #DeFi