No one in the Colombian public force has been removed except at their own request or violation of human rights, for participation in politics or for indications of corruption, it is logical that the vote for Abelardo represented a return to the lines of Zapateiro and Vargas to the public force, which I consider not to represent a certain ideology but an activity of association to commit crimes with serious affections to human rights. We backtracked when we had the highest level of appreciation of the armed forces and police by society in something so important to Colombian life. So we go back to the darker past, and with an aggravating one: the loss of national sovereignty, the air force will be shared between Colombia and the US and what comes is missiles on peasants and gold mining. Something like looting. As I said publicly, the greatest insecurity is that complicity relations between law enforcement officers and illegal armed drug trafficking organizations are strengthened, and that reappears today. It is the greatest danger to the nation. President Abelardo’s US citizenship takes us two and a half centuries back: to the viceroy. The Viceroyalty was an economic and social system based on slavery and servitude. With the reduction of public spending there will be no overcoming of the budget deficit but the bankruptcy of the national economy. The advance of capitalism will be destroyed and thousands of enterprises will be destroyed to return to extractivism and the big estate. Hunger and unemployment will increase, it will be the biggest contribution to what will be a possible revolution in Colombia. We just have to wait for the tiger’s lie to disappear because there are no tigers in America and for the same people who voted for Abelard to feel the consequences of his vote in their own family life. To undermine the principle of national sovereignty is to destroy the nation and that is why we go back to the era of the viceroy, when we were driven and put ourselves at the forefront of the 21st century. It’s a Pyrrhic victory that would have been the same if we won, because I think we won, but both would be Pyrrhic victories and no one really governs with a Pyrrhic victory. The right bet is a national agreement and preserving national sovereignty. If the agreement is not made, a great national paradox, Abelardo could really build the foundations of a popular revolution in Colombia. A blade so dangerous that any mistake triggers social and political violence. And so are the five republics of Bolivar. That is why I believe that one can try the national agreement and by the direct presence of the financial and political support of the U.S. government that not only put as a candidate a U.S. citizen, but directly control the software of, no more or less, the defense systems from outside attacks to the vulnerable software of the Baptist brothers. We have never had an electoral system as vulnerable as the one we have today. A system at the service of one of the candidates. That is why they did not bring the votes from abroad, because it is one of the pillars of the triumph of Abelardo, citizens in large numbers who went to the world by voting seven times in the ballot boxes and jurors who are not residents in foreign countries but were brought from Colombia, which annuls the voting of the tables. There was no scrutiny when 90 per cent of Covenant claims were not processed. We are facing a huge problem of the nation: either they hand over the government to the clientelism of Congress and the public force to the United States and to crime, or we make a fundamental national agreement in which President Donald Trump has to participate personally because he decided to participate in front in the elections in Colombia and that is the biggest constitutional cause for the election to be annulled.